• 首頁 (Home)
  • 理論介紹 (Theories)
    • 警戒色
    • 貝氏擬態 (Batesian mimicry)
    • 穆氏擬態 (Mullerian mimicry)
    • 副貝氏擬態 (quasi-Batesian mimicry)
  • 研究團隊 (research teams)
    • Candy Rowe
    • James Mallet
    • John skelhorn
  • 文獻蒐集 (Bibliography)
    • 2010-
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010
    • 2000-2009
      • 2009
      • 2008
      • 2007
      • 2006
      • 2005
      • 2004
      • 2003
      • 2002
      • 2001
      • 2000
    • More than 650 references on mimicry

擬態生物學

警戒色與擬態的介紹團隊,學術文章導讀,歷史背景,物種,與生物多樣性

photo: Olympic Naturual History Photos
標題:A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry

摘要

Although exceptional examples of adaptation are frequently celebrated, some outcomes of natural selection seem far from perfect. For example, many hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are harmless (Batesian) mimics of stinging Hymenoptera. However, although some hoverfly species are considered excellent mimics, other species bear only a superficial resemblance to their models and it is unclear why this is so. To evaluate hypotheses that have been put forward to explain interspecific variation in the mimetic fidelity of Palearctic Syrphidae we use a comparative approach. We show that the most plausible explanation is that predators impose less selection for mimetic fidelity on smaller hoverfly species because they are less profitable prey items. In particular, our findings, in combination with previous results, allow us to reject several key hypotheses for imperfect mimicry: first, human ratings of mimetic fidelity are positively correlated with both morphometric measures and avian rankings, indicating that variation in mimetic fidelity is not simply an illusion based on human perception; second, no species of syrphid maps out in multidimensional space as being intermediate in appearance between several different hymenopteran model species, as the multimodel hypothesis requires; and third, we find no evidence for a negative relationship between mimetic fidelity and abundance, which calls into question the kin-selection hypothesis. By contrast, a strong positive relationship between mimetic fidelity and body size supports the relaxed-selection hypothesis, suggesting that reduced predation pressure on less profitable prey species limits the selection for mimetic perfection.


不完美擬態 (imperfect mimicry) 指的是一個擬態物種(以人類觀點)猛一看很像A物種,但仔細端詳後又發現其實不太像,有時又會覺得很像B物種,但又覺得有差異,對人類來說就覺得「擬態的不完美」。這個看似對立於「完美擬態」的現象看似成立,其實存在著很多爭議,像是為什麼要有點不像?不像的部分對擬態也有貢獻?其實擬態兩個以上的物種?關於這些問題的研究產生很多對立的結果,到目前為止並未有一致的結論。

Fig. 1  食蚜蠅的斑紋分析,圓圈代表model,三角形代表mimics,白色代表蜜蜂型,灰色代表胡蜂型。
結果顯示兩型間的相似方向並不重疊。

Fig. 4 斑紋相似度與身體尺寸有強烈的正相關(詳細統計結果見原文)

這篇文章藉由比較性的方法來討論不完美擬態的演化來源。太細節的部分就姑且不談,作者群透過比較食蚜蠅 (hoverfly) 的型態(尺寸、斑紋與不同的接受者)與系統發生學的方式,發現以下幾個有趣的證據:

1. 透過型態的測量與鳥類的觀點來看,以人類的角度來判斷物種是否不完美擬態太過簡化這個現象;

2. 經過分析後發現,本來認為可能是擬態兩個擬態模型的食蚜蠅,其實沒有任何一個物種的斑紋實際上同時涉入兩種以上的擬態環,顯示「擬態多物種假說」值得存疑;

3. 沒有任何證據顯示擬態的精確度與物種豐度有負相關(物種數量越少,擬態的越精確),這可能與親屬選汰 (kin selection) 有關;

4. 擬態的精確度與身體尺寸有強烈的正相關,支持緩和選汰假說 (relaxed-selection hypothesis),顯示獲益較少的物種受到較少的捕食壓力,影響擬態精確度的選汰。

這個研究以食蚜蠅為例子是因為那實在是不完美擬態的典範,然而這篇文章並非完全解答這個現象,至少就食蚜蠅的總物種數來說,文中討論的物種數比例上不算多,有可能陷入見樹不見林的風險。不完美擬態也廣泛的發生在各種其他類群的昆蟲上,這個研究的論點是基於「不完美擬態是到目前為止的終點」,但更多觀察到的現象讓我們覺得「不完美擬態可能只是完美擬態的過程」,代表不同的類群不同的演化故事,帶來的結論可能大相逕庭。

Wrote by Chia-Hsuan Wei
photo from wiki hoverfly

標題:Do crab spiders perceive Batesian mimicry in hoverflies?

摘要

Many putative Batesian mimics only approximately resemble their supposed models, and such “imperfect” mimics are readily distin- guished from defended species by humans and other vertebrates. One explanation for the existence of imperfect mimics is that the most important predators of many mimics have very different sensory and cognitive abilities from those of a typical vertebrate. In such circumstances, selection for more accurate mimicry, as perceived by humans, may be reduced. Little is known, however, about how invertebrate predators perceive and respond to mimicry in insect prey. Here, we investigate the foraging behavior of the crab spider Synema globosum, an important predator of flower-visiting insects at our field site, which frequently encounters both Batesian mimics (hoverflies—Diptera: Syrphidae) and their models (bees and wasps—Hymenoptera). In the field, we found that spiders can distinguish among dipteran and hymenopteran prey taxa, frequently attacking some models and mimics, but avoiding others. Laboratory experi- ments suggest that some apparently accurate mimic taxa are more likely to be avoided when spiders have prior experience of an aver- sive wasp model. Avoidance by spiders of black and yellow striped artificial prey suggests visual cues play a role in prey selection, but there was no evidence that olfactory cues are used to identify dangerous or noxious species. Overall, our results provide some support for the hypothesis that invertebrate predator behavior can generate selection on visual signals in putative Batesian mimics.


photo from wiki Synema globosum

大部分研究擬態的研究中,通常認為捕食者要有良好的視力,要有好的認知能力、記憶力等等要件,所以選擇捕食者上會選脊椎動物,最常用的是鳥類,其次則是爬蟲類。對於無脊椎動物來說,一方面是科學家對其神經認知系統實在知道太少,一方面也不知道牠們的捕食行為是來自判斷或是反射。

所以有了這個研究,這個研究討論的是圓花葉蛛(蟹蛛科)是否能夠分辨食蚜蠅(mimic)與蜂(model)。研究主要分成視覺與嗅覺兩部分。結果就是嗅覺沒差異但視覺有差異。但有意思的是在獵物的選擇上,野外的觀察發現不是擬態的物種自然不用說被吃的很多,蜂 (wasp)被吃掉的比例比其mimic被吃掉的少,但蜜蜂 (bee)被吃的比例比mimic還高。而在討論如果先經歷了吃model的情況下,其經驗是否會影響後續的獵物選擇,則顯示蟹蛛的確是會避免某些長的相似的獵物。

雖然這個研究是個個案,但是的確提醒了研究擬態的科學家們,在考慮各種因子時別忽略無脊椎動物的重要性。

另外一個值得注意的點在於這個蜘蛛本身花色似乎是多態型的,假設mimic本身也有某種程度的視覺判斷,看到這麼明顯奇怪的東西不會跑嗎(如右圖)。另外蜂本身的振翅頻率發出的聲音這個研究沒有考慮進去,蜘蛛腳上的聽毛也是十分發達,這可能影響接近的物種究竟能不能攻擊的判斷(或許蜜蜂與其擬態者的差異就是這麼來的?)

至於為什麼是食蚜蠅呢?食蚜蠅是一個「不完美」擬態的典範,很多種類看起來很像什麼蜂,可是仔細一看又不太一樣,只有很少數的種類很完美的相似,另一個理由是食蚜蠅會訪花,也是蟹蛛會遇到的獵物種類之一。

有關食蚜蠅的故事之後整理會以主題的方式刊出。

心得:要想的事情又變的更多了啊(嘆)



Wrote by Chia-Hsuan Wei
photo from http://goo.gl/9CDbHK

原文標題:Evidence for Batesian mimicry in a polymorphic hoverfly


摘要[原文網址]


Palatable Batesian mimics are avoided by predators because they resemble noxious or defended species. The striking resemblance of many hoverflies to noxious Hymenoptera is a “textbook” example of Batesian mimicry, but evidence that selection by predators has shaped the evolution of hoverfly patterns is weak. We looked for geographical and temporal trends in frequencies of morphs of the polymorphic hoverfly Volucella bombylans that would support the hypothesis that these morphs are Batesian mimics of different bumblebee species. The frequency of the black and yellow hoverfly morph was significantly positively related to the frequency of black and yellow bumblebees across 52 sites. Similarly, the frequency of the red-tailed hoverfly morph was positively related to the frequency of red-tailed bumblebees. However, the frequencies of hoverfly morphs were positively spatially autocorrelated, and after controlling for this, only one of the two common hoverfly morphs showed a significant positive relationship with its putative model. We conclude that the distribution of V. bombylans morphs probably reflects geographical variation in selection by predators resulting from differences in the frequencies of noxious bumblebee species.

食蚜蠅總被認為是貝氏擬態的擬態者,擬態各種蜂類,包含蜜蜂、熊蜂等等,不過這個擬態關係通常被認定是預設的,也就是以前的人說是那就是,說像那就是像,只依靠外表的相似度判定兩個物種間的擬態關係,而缺乏實質的證據。這篇文章是在英國做的,選用的食蚜蠅叫做Volucella bombylans,是一個多態型的物種(見下圖),不同的型似乎剛好擬態不同地區的熊蜂(Bombus spp.),而多態型也就代表是同一種,在遺傳或是生態的基礎上比較不會有態大的差異,意即不太會有潛在性「這個可能有毒」的問題。

這三行剛好代表三群不同的類型,最下面的一列表示其model(本圖取自該篇文章)

這篇文章的取樣點調查短則一年,長則六年,採樣點遍及英國中南部。其結果顯示某區域model越多的地方,擬態該物種的食蚜蠅的那個型頻度也會越高,代表不一樣的型都藉由天擇的力量被淘汰掉了(詳細分析請見內文)。

這篇只是一個很簡單的邏輯,但實際上要找到兩個物種間互相擬態的證據是不容易的,而在現在擬態生物學的領域中,也很難單純的只依靠兩個物種的外型就直指其擬態關係,通常也會要求提出相關的證據,簡單的說,就是越來越難做了(嘆)。

Wrote by Chia-Hsuan Wei
Older Posts Home

FB專頁

熱門文章

  • [科普]自然界中的詐騙集團:生物間「擬態」現象的奧祕
  • 兩種擬態枯葉的珊瑚礁魚類是否有類似的成長歷程?
  • [Review] 警戒色與擬態的多樣性之演化:關於多態型、移動平衡與種化

精選文章

貓頭鷹蝶的眼紋真的擬態貓頭鷹的眼睛嗎?

相關網站

  • Heliconius Homepage
    Richard ffrench-Constant, Heliconius Genome Consortium Pioneer Richard ffrench-Constant was a key member of the original Heliconius Genome Consortium which...
  • 這是什麼啊? 可以吃嗎?
    最近出現一個被狂轉的新聞,大意是說有人為了避免蝸牛被路殺所以在其殼上彩繪,希望這樣就能讓人類注意到蝸牛的存在而不要把牠們踩死。這聽起來好像立意不錯喔? 但就我們研究警戒與擬態的角度來說,我們認為這種作法天真且有些荒謬,為什麼呢? - 在偽裝(camouflage)與警戒(aposematism)形成...
  • WELCOME TO THE BIODIVERSITY LAB! | Biodiversity Lab
  • Kronforst Lab at the University of Chicago
  • mallet lab
  • MimeticButterflies
  • Mathieu Joron - Home
  • Evolution of predator-prey interactions — Bio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitos

文章類型

  • 文章 (Article) 113
  • 擬態環 (mimicry ring) 12
  • 回顧 (review) 10
  • 科普 4
  • 擬態那些事 3
  • 書 (Book) 3
  • 評論 (comment) 1

研究領域

  • 貝氏擬態 (Batesian mimicry) (43)
  • 警戒性 (Aposematism) (40)
  • 穆氏擬態 (Müllerian mimicry) (37)
  • 多態型 (polymorphism) (16)
  • 擬態環 (mimicry ring) (12)
  • 侵略型擬態 (aggressive mimicry) (10)
  • 隱蔽性 (crypsis) (10)
  • 不完美擬態 (imperfect mimicry) (6)
  • 種化 (speciation) (5)
  • 雌性擬態 (female-limited mimicry) (5)
  • 性擇 (sexual selection) (4)
  • 鳥蛋寄生 (egg parasite) (4)
  • 眼斑 (eyespot) (3)
  • 假頭 (false head) (2)
  • 性雙型性 (sexual dimorphism) (2)
  • 擬蟻性 (Myrmecomorphomania) (2)
  • 機動性擬態 (locomotory mimicry) (2)
  • "模糊"型擬態 (satyric mimicry) (1)

研究方式

  • 行為學 (Ethology) (46)
  • 生態 (Ecology) (21)
  • 系統發生學 (phylogenetics) (16)
  • 基因體 (Genomics) (12)
  • 視覺模型 (visual model) (10)
  • 模擬(modelling and simulation) (6)
  • 遺傳學 (genetics) (6)
  • 族群遺傳 (population genetics) (5)
  • 分子生物學 (Molecular biology) (4)
  • 化學生態 (Chemical ecology) (3)
  • 分子鑑定 (molecular identificaiton) (1)
  • 古生物學 (palaeontology) (1)
  • 地理資訊系統 (GIS) (1)
  • 演化發育學 (Evo-Devo) (1)

分類群

Copyright © 2015 擬態生物學. Designed by OddThemes | Distributed By Gooyaabi Templates